View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
topicmaker Veteran


Joined: 28 Feb 2006 Posts: 25660
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: 'Cloaking device' idea proposed |
|
|
er spacecraft invisible in Star Trek might just work in reality, two mathematicians have claimed.
They have outlined their concept in a research paper published in one of the UK Royal Society's
scientific journals. Nicolae Nicorovici and Graeme Milton propose that placing certain objects
close to a material called a superl...read more |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
miglaugh Senior Member

Joined: 20 Mar 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention the device would probably have to be much bigger than the thing you are trying to cloak. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
admin Site Admin


Joined: 28 Feb 2006 Posts: 907
|
Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's fairly interesting. However, all of these "cloaking" stories suffer from basically the same problem. Making something invisible is much, much more complicated than blocking light, or cancelling light, or anything like that.
To become invisible in the sense of Star Trek cloaking device requires much more than "not being able to see" the object. It means not being able to detect the presence of the object... under real-world lighting conditions, with real-world scenes _behind_ the object, and from more than one vantage point at the same time.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|