Updated:05:40 PM EDT Sep 19

this is ggmania.com subsite

rss feed 
top 100
submit news

FREE eBooks

CD/DVD tools
Free Antivir

Forex Brokers Reviewed


Download Instagram Stories
Syllable Word Counter

Try to play real money casino with no risk by claiming offers at freespinsnodeposituk.com that lists no deposit free spins

When playing bingo online, we recommend to read verified reviews at bingosite.org.uk before choosing a bingo site to play at.

Check out https://casinopiloten.se/basta-casinon-online for the best online casino sites with highest bonuses in Sweden.

Bästa mobilcasino means the best mobile casino in Swedish. Visit NyaMobilCasinon.se and play at top smartphone casinos.

Looking for free spins? https://nyacasinonsverige.se/nya-free-spins/ Visit and claim 10, 20, 50 or more extra spins to play your favourite slots.

(C) 2006-2018 TechAmok
All Rights Reserved.

Windows on ARM: Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Intel Celeron N3450 - TechAmok

Windows on ARM: Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs. Intel Celeron N3450 - [hardware]
02:55 PM EDT - Mar,25 2018 - post a comment

Microsoft has come up with some strange ideas over the years. Their latest one, which has been coming from a while, is running Windows on ARM processors once again, with the help of Qualcomm and some daring device manufacturers. This new Windows on ARM initiative was announced in 2016 and formally launched last year, and now we have laid our hands on the very first Windows on ARM device, the HP Envy x2, for some serious benchmarking. The HP Envy x2 is not running an Intel or AMD x86 processor, but an ARM-based Qualcomm Snapdragon 835, the same system-on-a-chip used by many of 2017's flagship Android smartphones. It will soon be joined by other devices from Asus and Lenovo, using the same SoC for what should be largely the same results. Now you might remember Microsoft's attempt to get Windows running on ARM hardware way back at the launch of Windows 8 with a variant of the OS known as Windows RT. The infamous OS and the products that ran it were complete failures, to the embarrassment of Microsoft, and that was down to one simple fact: you couldn't run any traditional x86 applications, so you were limited to the crappy and very limited Metro-style apps found in the Windows Store. This time, things are different. The new Windows on ARM can run desktop x86 apps through emulation, which makes the whole platform actually useful. Apps in the Windows Store will still provide the best experience, as most are UWP apps that natively support ARM, but if you need to run your favorite desktop apps, that should be possible in this new iteration.
When looking at UWP apps that run natively on ARM, the Snapdragon 835 is typically faster than the Intel Celeron N3450 and varying degrees slower than Intel's Core processors from the last few years, based on limited testing. Certainly when you put the Envy x2 next to an N3450-based device, just browsing through Explorer and using Edge is noticeably faster with Windows on ARM and I think that's reflected to an extent with the benchmark results.

It's not that surprising to see the Snapdragon 835 fall behind Intel's U and Y series Core processors when looking at native apps, as the Snapdragon 835 has a very low TDP, while Intel's competing chips can go as high as 15 or even 25 watts. Put more power in the equation, and you're likely to win.

However, the real killer is x86 emulation performance. Being able to run x86 desktop apps is a key ingredient to this new Windows variant. Even ignoring the compatibility issues for a moment, x86 performance on ARM chips is terrible, which puts the whole platform into question at least in this early iteration.

When the Snapdragon fails to get even close to a measly Atom-based Celeron processor in a number of workloads, you're not going to get a good real world experience. When you use the device with a desktop app like Excel or Photoshop, it's easy to get frustrated by how sluggish, laggy and unimpressive the performance is. Using a Celeron N3450 is tough when you're used to Core i5 or i7 performance, and the Snapdragon 835 is significantly worse than this.

Add your comment (free registrationrequired)

Short overview of recent news articles

Sep,19 2018 Twitter Adds Ability to Send Replies While Watching Videos
Sep,19 2018 NVIDIA GeForce 411.63 Game Ready Driver
Sep,19 2018 How someone stole $200,000 from me
Sep,19 2018 Mozilla Launches a VR Browser
Sep,18 2018 How To Make a Bulletproof iPhone Case
Sep,18 2018 Apple Turns the Page On iBooks, Now Apple Books In iTunes App Store
Sep,18 2018 Congress Wants to Drop the Hammer on ZTE Should It Mess Up
Sep,17 2018 CAPTAIN MARVEL - Teaser Trailer (2019)
Sep,17 2018 Crash your iPhone with just a few lines of CSS
Sep,17 2018 Google Adds a Dash of AI to Its Sound Search Song Seeker
Sep,17 2018 RTX 2080 TI vs GTX 1080 TI Benchmark
Sep,15 2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080Ti & RTX 2080 Benchmarks
Sep,14 2018 Everything You Need to Know about the iPhone XS in 1 Minute
Sep,14 2018 10 Things You Might Not have Noticed in Fortnite
Sep,13 2018 Apple's new iPhones are priced absurdly high in Europe
Sep,13 2018 Spotify Boosts Device Download Limit to 10,000 Songs
Sep,13 2018 Apple All But Scraps Its AirPower Wireless Charging Pad
Sep,13 2018 HP Introduces Metal Jet 3D Printers
>> News Archive <<

TechAmok - Privacy Policy        loading time:0.01secs