Updated:05:35 PM EDT Jul 22


this is ggmania.com subsite

NEWS
rss feed 
 
top 100
archive
submit news

FREE eBooks

REVIEWS
 
SOFTWARE
CD/DVD tools
Free Antivir
Security
Drivers
Utilities
 
FORUMS
comments
hardware
software
off-topic
 
LINKS
 
SPONSORS:

Forex Brokers Reviewed



Try to play real money casino with no risk by claiming offers at freespinsnodeposituk.com that lists no deposit free spins

When playing bingo online, we recommend to read verified reviews at bingosite.org.uk before choosing a bingo site to play at.



Bästa mobilcasino means the best mobile casino in Swedish. Visit NyaMobilCasinon.se and play at top smartphone casinos.

Looking for free spins? https://nyacasinonsverige.se/nya-free-spins/ Visit and claim 10, 20, 50 or more extra spins to play your favourite slots.

(C) 2006-2018 TechAmok
All Rights Reserved.


CONTACT
 
Supreme Court Weighing Warrants for Cell Phone Location - TechAmok

Supreme Court Weighing Warrants for Cell Phone Location - [crime-law]
04:38 PM EST - Nov,30 2017 - post a comment

The Supreme Court today heard a case regarding whether or not law enforcement can access certain types of cell location data without a warrant. Government agencies do not currently need a warrant when requesting location and other data held by phone companies thanks to a 1979 court case. In that case, the Supreme Court decided a suspect had no reasonable expectation of privacy because he dialed phone numbers into his home phone. In so doing, he gave the phone company, a third party, that information. Personal data held by third parties is not as protected as information held by suspects. This third-party doctrine is what allows law enforcement to seek suspects' historical movements from cell phone companies without obtaining a warrant. In more recent cases, the Supreme Court has ruled that the government needs a warrant to seek GPS data and search suspects' cell phones. Today's case, Carpenter v. United States, argues that the third-party doctrine is outdated and that law enforcement seeking such data should be required to obtain a warrant as it would for GPS data. Carpenter's lawyers argued taking location data from a third party without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment. "Most Americans, I think, still want to avoid Big Brother," noted Justice Sonia Sotomayor, further saying most people take their phones into bathrooms, bedrooms, and dressing rooms, all places where they expect privacy. At least four justices agree with Carpenter's basic argument, according to the Associated Press. The panel of justices will make a decision on the matter by next June.


Add your comment (free registrationrequired)

Short overview of recent news articles

Jul,22 2018 GeForce GTX 1170 Turing GPU Beating GTX 1080 Ti
Jul,22 2018 Aquaman Official Trailer
Jul,21 2018 Godzilla: King of the Monsters Official Trailer
Jul,21 2018 Godzilla Comes to VR
Jul,20 2018 Star Wars: The Clone Wars to Return With New Episodes
Jul,20 2018 TITANS - Official Trailer
Jul,20 2018 George R.R. Martin's Nightflyers Season 1 Comic-Con Trailer
Jul,19 2018 Corning Designed Gorilla Glass 6 to Better Handle Real-World Drops
Jul,19 2018 Hottest Babes on the Internet #97
Jul,18 2018 Google Vows to Appeal $5 Billion Fine from EU
Jul,18 2018 Frida Aasen In The Hottest Photoshoot Of The Year
Jul,18 2018 50 Years of Innovation at Intel
Jul,17 2018 BLOOD MACHINES Exclusive Trailer (2018) Sci-Fi Movie
Jul,17 2018 Assassination Nation Red Band Trailer #1 (2018)
Jul,17 2018 The Matrix: EARLY ACCESS
Jul,17 2018 How exactly does binary code work?
Jul,17 2018 Extract password from TeamViewer memory using Frida
Jul,16 2018 AVENGERS INFINITY WAR "Avengers VS Thanos" Fight
>> News Archive <<

TechAmok - Privacy Policy        loading time:0.01secs